Knowing the Father, Seeing Love in Jesus, and Being Led by the Spirit
Sometimes on our way to loving God we fall into traps that just get in the way of us experiencing God to the fullest measure which we are capable. Doctrines that end up raising questions. Doctrines that side track our attention with pointless overthink. And doctrines that become weaponized to establish a set of elites. Consider the Scriptures:
6 Therefore as you have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him [rooted in Him and built on Him],
7 having been deeply rooted [in Him] and now being continually built up [in Him], and established in your faith, just as you were taught, and overflowing in it with gratitude.8 See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception [pseudo-intellectual babble], based on the tradition of men, based on the elementary principles of the world, rather than [grounded] in Christ.
9 For in Him all the fullness of Deity (the Godhead) dwells bodily [completely expressing the divine essence of God].
10 And in Him you have been made complete [achieving spiritual stature through Christ], and He is the head over all rule and authority [of every angelic and earthly power].— Colossians 2:6-10 (Amplified Bible)
These give is a very clear picture of who Jesus is and where our focus is to be. On Jesus, not tangled up by gatekeeper doctrines that distract us from the simplicity of the Good News.
The Simplicity of Christ
- You don't need anyone's permission to trust God.
- You don't need a theology degree from an approved institution to follow Jesus.
- You don't need to solve ancient philosophical puzzles in a dead language to walk with the Spirit.
But somewhere along the way, many of us were told otherwise.
We were told that faith requires mastering complex doctrines that didn't exist when the books of the Bible were written. That unless we can explain God in precise theological and philosophical terms, our faith is somehow deficient and our walk with Christ suspect.
We were often told to study what theologians said about God instead of simply trusting what God shows us in Scripture.
This is an invitation to lay that burden down.
The Bible never asks us to solve God. It invites us to know God—as the source of all life, as love made visible in Jesus, and as the guiding presence of the Spirit walking with us today.
That's enough.
And it always has been.
What Scripture Actually Shows Us
The Bible is remarkably straightforward about who God is and how we encounter God.
It doesn't give us philosophical formulas. It gives us relationship.
The Father — Where Life Comes From
Scripture consistently shows us God as the source from whom everything flows.
Creator. Sustainer. Provider. The one who gives breath.
Jesus prays to the Father. He teaches us to pray to the Father. He shows us that God is the origin of all good things, the one who never stops caring for what he has made.
"For the Father has life in himself." (John 5:26)
This isn't theology. It's trust.
When you pray, you're speaking to the source of your life. When you wake up breathing, that's the Father sustaining you. When provision comes, when doors open, when unexpected grace arrives—that's the Father giving.
You don't need to understand the mechanics. You just need to receive.
Jesus — What God's Love Looks Like
In Jesus, we see what God is actually like.
Not in theory. Not in doctrine. In a human life. A visible example to pattern after.
When Jesus heals someone society has thrown away, we see God's heart. When he forgives the guilty, challenges the powerful, includes the excluded, and lays down his life for people who don't deserve it—we're seeing God's character in flesh and blood.
"Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father." (John 14:9)
This is the most important sentence in the conversation about who God is.
Jesus didn't come to confuse us with theological complexity. He came to show us what God is like when God walks among us.
Kind. Fierce. Tender. Uncompromising about justice. Scandalously merciful. Full of Wisdom and Truth.
If you want to know God, look at Jesus. That's the whole point.
The Spirit — God Here, Now, With You
The Spirit is not an abstract concept. The Spirit is God present and active in your life right now.
Teaching. Guiding. Comforting. Convicting. Empowering.
"When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all truth." (John 16:13)
The Spirit is how God remains close. How God speaks into your circumstances. How God strengthens you when you're exhausted, redirects you when you're lost, and whispers hope when everything feels dark.
You know the Spirit is real because you've felt that nudge toward truth. That unexpected sense of peace. That conviction you couldn't ignore. That courage you didn't have five minutes ago. That answer that has eluded for weeks, that clarity when knowledge meets understanding.
That's God in your present reality.
Not distant. Not theoretical. Here.
One God, Known Through Relationship
Here's what matters:
God is one. Not divided. Not competing with himself. Not three separate beings.
But God is also not distant, solitary, or abstract.
Scripture shows us one God known in three ways—as the source of life, as love made visible, and as present guide.
These aren't masks God puts on and takes off. They're how the one God actually relates to us.
The Father doesn't stop being Father when Jesus walks the earth. Jesus doesn't stop revealing God after the resurrection. The Spirit doesn't arrive to replace either one.
At Jesus' baptism, all three are present at once—Jesus in the water, the Spirit descending, the Father's voice speaking love.
When Paul blesses believers, he names all three in one breath: grace from Jesus, love from the Father, fellowship in the Spirit.
This isn't philosophy. It's Scripture showing us relationship.
Why This Matters for You
You may have been taught that unless you can explain God, you're not a "real" Christian.
You may have been told your salvation depends on accepting doctrines that use words the Bible never uses.
You may have felt excluded, less-than, or spiritually inferior because you couldn't master theological systems that require years of study.
Here's the truth:
The Bible never asks you to explain God. It invites you to trust God.
- You can pray to the Father without understanding Greek philosophy.
- You can follow Jesus without a seminary degree.
- You can walk with the Spirit without solving mysteries theologians have argued about for centuries.
In fact, that's exactly what Jesus invites you to do.
A Simple Way Forward
- Trust the Father as the source of your life.
Pray. Ask. Receive. Rest in the knowledge that you are cared for by the one who gives all good things. - Follow Jesus as the clearest picture of who God is.
When you want to know what God thinks, what God values, how God treats people—look at Jesus. That's your answer. - Stay attentive to the Spirit's leading.
Listen for that inner nudge toward truth. Pay attention when peace comes or conviction rises. That's God guiding you, right now, in real time.
You don't need anyone's permission to do this.
You don't need to pass theological tests.
You just need to say yes.
For Those Who Feel Caught
- Maybe you've been told you must choose between theological camps—progressive or conservative, traditional or modern, orthodox or whatever.
- Maybe you've been made to feel that asking questions means you're losing your faith.
- Maybe you're exhausted from defending positions you never chose and explaining doctrines you don't fully understand.
You're not alone.
There are many of us who love Jesus, trust Scripture, and refuse to let theological gatekeepers decide who's "in" and who's "out."
We believe the Bible shows us a God who is near, not distant.
A God we can trust, not just study.
A God we encounter through relationship, not just doctrine.
If that describes you, welcome.
You belong here.
Faith Over Factions exists to help people walk with God without fear, without coercion, and without pretending certainty where Scripture leaves mystery.
You are not required to explain God.
You are invited to know God.
And that invitation is still open.
Frequently Asked Questions
Scholarly answers with references to theological questions about knowing God without the Trinity doctrine
Yes. Trinitarian doctrine is flawed theology that needlessly complicates God with the inclusion of Greek philosophical concepts that "Westernize" Christianity.
The doctrine was also employed to create an elite priestly gatekeeper class who "hold the mystery" that ordinary believers supposedly can't handle.
It turns faith into a philosophical puzzle that requires mastery of fourth-century Greek metaphysical categories—substance, essence, and personhood—introduced long after the Apostles and foreign to Scripture’s relational witness of God.
The Bible never asks believers to solve God. It invites us to trust the Father, follow Jesus, and remain attentive to the Spirit. That's enough.
The creeds addressed perceived threats and provided a focal point for unity. But the philosophical framework they used should not be confused with the biblical witness itself, and it should never be weaponized as a test of orthodoxy to exclude sincere believers.
The Nicene and Chalcedonian creeds were not born from pure theological inquiry. They emerged from imperial pressure.
When Constantine defeated Licinius in 324 to become sole ruler of the Roman Empire, "he wished to ensure religious unity for the spiritual and political stability of the empire."1
Constantine himself said, "Division in the church is worse than war."2
Historian Rev. Dr. Kathleen M. Griffin argues that the Council of Nicaea "was less about theological unity and more about securing the stability of a fractured empire," and that Constantine "employed Christianity as a tool for political unity, transforming it into an 'imperial religion' to strengthen his hold on power."3
As Paula Fredriksen notes, Constantine and church leaders agreed that "proper religion should be unanimous, the identity of and unity of the true church unambiguous."4
The failing empire could not withstand doctrinal division.5
Yes, the creeds protected some essential truths:
- Jesus is fully divine, not a created being or lesser god
- The Spirit is God present, not an impersonal force
But they could have simply affirmed what Scripture shows without importing Greek philosophical categories that turned faith into an intellectual puzzle requiring expert interpreters.
The empire needed unified doctrine to bulwark failing structures. They needed theological complexity that required a priestly class to keep the plebes in line by being the sole authority for spiritual matters.
They could have just used the truth Scripture already provided. But that sets people free. Nt the outcome power ever desires.
References:
- St Andrews Encyclopedia of Theology, "The Theology of the Council of Nicaea," 2024
- Christian History Magazine, "The First Council of Nicaea," 325 AD
- World Council of Churches, Kathleen M. Griffin, "Creed, Sword, and Empire," 2024
- National Geographic, Paula Fredriksen, "How the Council of Nicaea Changed Christianity Forever," May 2025
- GotQuestions.org, "What Occurred at the Council of Nicea?"
The technical terminology of Trinity doctrine—ousia (substance/essence), hypostasis (person), homoousios (same substance)—comes directly from Greek philosophy, not Scripture.
Platonic Origins
Plato (429-347 BC) believed in a divine triad of "God, the ideas, [and] the World-Spirit."1 Later Greek thinkers refined this into three "substances"—the supreme God or "the One," from which came "mind" or "thought" and a "spirit" or "soul."2
Aristotelian Influence
Gregory of Nyssa, one of the Cappadocian fathers whose views were adopted at Nicaea and Constantinople, was "substantially influenced by Aristotle's Categories in his development of the doctrine of Trinity." Aristotle's concept of ousia (substance or essence) "was fully adopted, though with reinterpretation."3
Basil the Great "borrowed Aristotle's distinction between universal and particular categories," and "his theory of substance, used later to describe the Persons of the Trinity, is explained and elaborated by Aristotelian philosophical language."4
Alexandria School's Role
"The Alexandria catechetical school, which revered Clement of Alexandria and Origen... applied the allegorical method to the explanation of Scripture. Its thought was influenced by Plato... Athanasius and the three Cappadocians [whose Trinitarian views were adopted by the Catholic Church at Nicaea and Constantinople] had been included among its members."5
Scholarly Consensus
"The doctrines of the Logos and the Trinity received their shape from Greek Fathers, who... were much influenced, directly or indirectly, by the Platonic philosophy... That errors and corruptions crept into the Church from this source can not be denied."6
Even conservative evangelical scholar William Lane Craig acknowledges: "For better or worse, like it or not, this is one of the clearest examples of the influence of philosophical thinking upon theology because this doctrine... is formed out of a kind of synthesis between John's Gospel and the thought of Philo of Alexandria and the Middle Platonism that he represented."7
References:
- Charles Bigg, Christian Platonists of Alexandria, 1886, p. 249
- United Church of God, "Greek Philosophy's Influence on the Trinity Doctrine"
- Van der Walt, "Three I Know Not What: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on the Doctrine of Trinity," Verbum et Ecclesia, 2013
- Nathan Jacobs, referenced in Van der Walt, 2013
- Hubert Jedin, Ecumenical Councils of the Catholic Church: an Historical Outline, 1960, p. 28
- Samuel Macauley Jackson, ed., The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, 1911, Vol. 9, p. 91
- William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith, "Doctrine of God: Trinity (Part 5)"
No. Classic Sabellian modalism teaches that Father, Son, and Spirit are strictly sequential roles—God switches between them like an actor changing masks.
Modalistic monarchianism (like Oneness Pentecostalism) is more nuanced, seeing them as successive manifestations rather than strict sequence, but still focused on modes of revelation rather than genuine relationship.
Scripture clearly rejects both approaches by showing simultaneous relationship:
- At Jesus' baptism, all three are present at once—Jesus in the water, the Spirit descending, the Father's voice speaking (Matthew 3:16-17)
- In John 14-17, Jesus prays to the Father while promising the Spirit, with no suggestion that one replaces another
- Paul blesses believers "in the name of" all three simultaneously (2 Corinthians 13:14)
This reflection affirms that simultaneity. The Father, Jesus, and the Spirit are all how the one God is known and encountered—not sequential roles, not successive manifestations, and not three separate beings.
What we reject is the demand to explain the mechanics using Greek philosophical categories that Scripture never requires.
Oneness theology is modalistic monarchian—it teaches one God who reveals himself as Father, Son, and Spirit, but as successive manifestations rather than simultaneous relationship.
The UPCI (United Pentecostal Church International) officially teaches: "This one true God has revealed Himself as Father; through His Son, in redemption; and as the Holy Spirit, by emanation" and that "before the incarnation, this one true God manifested Himself in divers ways. In the incarnation, He manifests Himself in the Son, who walked among men. As He works in the lives of believers, He manifests Himself as the Holy Spirit."1
While Oneness theology is more sophisticated than pure Sabellian modalism, it still struggles to account for Scripture's simultaneous relationships:
- At Jesus' baptism, all three are present at once—Jesus in the water, the Spirit descending, the Father's voice speaking (Matthew 3:16-17)
- Jesus prays to the Father (John 17:1) - not to himself in a different mode
- The Father sends the Son, the Son sends the Spirit—language of real relationship, not just manifestation
This reflection rejects the manifestation framework entirely—whether successive (Oneness) or strictly sequential (pure modalism)—because Scripture shows genuine relationship, not just modes of appearance.
However, this reflection also rejects the opposite extreme: demanding that believers accept post-biblical philosophical language (like "three persons in one substance") as necessary for faithfulness.
Both Oneness theology and Trinity doctrine make the same mistake: they try to systematize what Scripture simply shows relationally.
References:
- UPCI Manual, quoted in multiple sources including dividetheword.blog and bible.ca
John 1:1 presents a profound paradox: "The Word was with God, and the Word was God."
This shows both distinction (with God) and unity (was God). It's a relational statement showing us how God reveals himself, not a philosophical formula to be decoded.
The Trinity doctrine emerged as one attempt to honor that paradox using Greek philosophical categories. But the Bible gives us the paradox—it doesn't give us the systematic explanation.
Notably, even John's use of "Logos" (Word) reflects Hellenistic philosophical influence. As William Lane Craig notes, John's prologue adopted "Middle Platonic categories talking about the Logos. This is not from the Old Testament or Jewish Wisdom literature."1
This reflection affirms the biblical tension: Jesus is the full revelation of God, yet prays to the Father. The Spirit is God present, yet sent by Jesus. We hold those truths together without demanding philosophical precision Scripture never requires.
References:
- William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith, "Doctrine of God: Trinity (Part 5)"
Scripture never makes acceptance of Trinitarian doctrine a requirement for salvation.
The Gospel in Its Simplest Form
Paul summarizes the gospel in its simplest, most essential form:
"For I handed on to you first of all what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures." (1 Corinthians 15:3-4, AMP)
No metaphysical explanation is added. No philosophical framework is required. The gospel is an announcement of what God has done in Christ, not a test of doctrinal precision.
Jesus' Own Definition
Jesus himself defines eternal life this way:
"This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent." (John 17:3, AMP)
Eternal life is rooted in relationship and recognition, not theological architecture.
The Witness of Acts
Throughout the book of Acts, people come to faith by believing that Jesus is Lord and Messiah, crucified and raised by God. They repent. They believe. They are baptized. The Trinity is never explained, defined, or invoked as a condition of conversion.
- Peter's sermons do not require it (Acts 2)
- Philip's evangelism does not introduce it (Acts 8)
- Paul's preaching does not hinge on it (Acts 13, 17)
Not once is someone asked to affirm a doctrine that would not be articulated until centuries later.
What Salvation Actually Requires
Salvation has always been about trusting Jesus.
Not mastering philosophical categories. Not assenting to technical formulations. Not navigating Greek metaphysics.
The New Testament calls people to repentance, allegiance, and faith in the risen Christ. Everything else grows from that foundation—but it is never made the foundation itself.
That distinction matters.
References:
- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 (Amplified Bible) - Paul's summary of the gospel
- John 17:3 (Amplified Bible) - Jesus defines eternal life
- Acts 2:14-41 - Peter's Pentecost sermon, no Trinity doctrine required
- Acts 8:26-40 - Philip and the Ethiopian, belief in Jesus sufficient
- Acts 13:16-41 - Paul's sermon in Pisidian Antioch, focused on Jesus' resurrection
- Acts 17:22-31 - Paul at Athens, no Trinitarian formulation
No. Progressive Christianity often redefines core doctrines or treats Scripture as culturally conditioned opinion. This reflection does neither.
It affirms:
- God's oneness (Deuteronomy 6:4)
- Jesus as the full revelation of God (John 14:9, Colossians 1:15)
- The Spirit as God personally present (John 16:13)
- Jesus' death and resurrection for our sins (1 Corinthians 15:3-4)
- Scripture's authority
It simply questions whether fourth-century philosophical categories should be treated as binding on all believers when Scripture itself does not use them.
That's not progressive. That's returning to what Scripture actually says.
This reflection explicitly affirms that Jesus is the full revelation of God:
- "Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father" (John 14:9)
- "The Word was God" (John 1:1)
- "The image of the invisible God" (Colossians 1:15)
- "The exact representation of God's being" (Hebrews 1:3)
Questioning whether "three persons in one substance" is the only faithful way to honor Scripture's witness is not the same as denying Jesus' divinity.
Jesus is fully God. Scripture is clear about that. How we philosophically explain that reality is a different question—one Scripture doesn't require us to answer.
Because people are being hurt by theological gatekeeping.
Many believers feel disqualified from faith because they struggle with Trinitarian metaphysics. Others are told their salvation is suspect if they don't use precise theological language.
Churches split over this. Friendships end. People walk away from faith entirely because they've been told they must master unscriptural concepts to be "real" Christians.
This reflection says: You can trust the one God revealed in Jesus and present through the Spirit without being required to master theological and philosophical systems Scripture never demands.
The goal is freedom to follow Jesus faithfully, not satisfy the dictates of theological gatekeeping.
Follow Scripture's lead:
- Pray to the Father as Jesus taught (Matthew 6:9)
- Trust Jesus as the full revelation of God's love (John 14:9)
- Remain attentive to the Spirit's guidance (John 16:13)
- Affirm God's oneness (Deuteronomy 6:4)
Hold these together without demanding philosophical precision Scripture never requires.
Let relationship precede explanation.
Fair question. I'm not asking you to accept this on authority—I'm asking you to test it against Scripture. But since you asked:
Professional Background
I've spent my career as a technical writer, web developer/designer and SEO consultant, work that requires research, analysis, writing, and the ability to organize complex information for different audiences. As a veteran submariner, I learned unique approaches to problem solving and a high degree of versatility and precision—skills that transfer directly to theological analysis. Those abilities aren't credentials, but they're not irrelevant either.
Ministry Experience
I served 20+ years on pastoral staff in a Oneness Pentecostal church. I know this tradition from the inside—its strengths, its convictions, and its theological framework. And spent slot of time in study of the early church and various views of God that were developing around the time of the Nicean Council. I didn't leave because I got mad. I left because there were spiritual needs that weren't being met, questions with no satisfactory answer within the Apostolic Pentecostal framework and lastly because of my own crisis of both health and faith, along with a healthy dose of self-hatred for perceived failures in living up to the definitions of God presented to me.
Study and Conversation
I've spent a lifetime studying theology, science, and technology—often at their intersections. I've had thousands of conversations with hundreds of people about faith, doctrine, and Scripture. Many were pastors, teachers, and theologians from various traditions. Those conversations taught me that sincere people can disagree, and that humility matters more than winning arguments.
Why I Write
I write for people who are tired—tired of being told their questions are dangerous, tired of doctrinal gatekeeping, tired of choosing between intellectual honesty and faith.
I'm not a scholar. I'm not a celebrity pastor or any other kind of minister. I'm not selling a system. I am a Christian thinker. That's it.
I'm a believer who reads carefully, thinks honestly, and refuses to pretend certainty where Scripture leaves room for mystery.
The Real Question
Don't trust this because of my credentials. Test it against Scripture. Ask whether it honors Jesus, takes the Bible seriously, and treats people with dignity.
If it does those things, my résumé doesn't matter.
If it doesn't, my résumé can't save it.
